The driver implements Microsoft's proprietary RNDIS protocol, which is the only protocol supported natively by Android devices although Linux and Windows users have enjoyed native RNDIS drivers for years, Mac OS X supports only CDC Ethernet devices out of the box. HoRNDIS is implemented as a kext, rather than as a user-space program that opens a TAP or TUN device this means that it does not conflict with other TAP/TUN kexts that you might have installed (like OpenVPN, Tunnelblick, or Cisco VPN). Although you should be careful with all drivers that you install on your computer, HoRNDIS has been tested at least well enough for the author (and many others) to run full time on their own personal computers. It is known to work with Mac OS X versions 10.6.8 (Snow Leopard) through 10.14 (Mojave – see notes below), and has been tested on a wide variety of phones. HoRNDIS (pronounce: “horrendous”) is a driver for Mac OS X that allows you to use your Android phone's native USB tethering mode to get Internet access. And we're not spending hundreds of dollars to upgrade software we don't need to.HoRNDIS is now maintained by Mikhail Iakhiaev, and this page is in a state of transition – keep your eyes peeled for updates soon. Otherwise, we're getting along okay the way we are. If PDAnet, or somebody, will produce a solution that works, fine. There's no compelling reason to do that, and I won't. But only if I can tether to my iBook, when I'm on the road travelling, because I'm not going to pay for a data plan for a Droid plus continue to pay for the USB modem I currently use for the iBook. Why should I simply have to spend hundreds of dollars upgrading certain applications just to "upgrade" to OS 10.5 or later? Frankly, before I did that, I think I might ditch OS X altogether and just migrate to Linux.īasically, I'd like to replace my Verizon LGEnv with a Droid. Just "upgrading" (if that's really the appropriate term) will mean that some older "legacy apps" that some of may continue to use will apparently not be able to be used inasmuch as 10.5 + appears not to support "Classic".įrankly, I'm beginning to find this almost cavalier disregard for those of us still kind of locked into needing support for some of these old apps to be a bit of a turn off. For many of us, there may be an issue with "upgrading" past 10.4.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |